THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Anything and everything... except the youth room... or what belongs in the Purgatory Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
wosbald
What's the funny part?
What's the funny part?
Posts: 17280
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by wosbald » Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:05 pm

+JMJ+

Image




"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
Del
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Posts: 34825
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by Del » Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:34 pm

Del wrote:
Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:50 pm
Troubling, if not scandalous:

http://www.lifenews.com/2017/06/14/vati ... e-academy/
Vatican Names Pro-Abortion Philosopher to Pro-Life Academy

....

Biggar, a professor of theology at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, has made past statements in support of abortion and possibly even limited euthanasia, The National Catholic Register reports.

During a conversation with pro-abortion, pro-infanticide Professor Peter Singer, Biggar once said he thinks abortions should be legal up to 18 weeks after an unborn baby’s conception, The Catholic Herald reports.

“I would be inclined to draw the line for abortion at 18 weeks after conception, which is roughly about the earliest time when there is some evidence of brain activity, and therefore of consciousness,” Biggar said in 2011.

He continued: “It’s not clear that a human foetus is the same kind of thing as an adult or a mature human being, and therefore deserves quite the same treatment. It then becomes a question of where we draw the line, and there is no absolutely cogent reason for drawing it in one place over another.”
A somewhat unrelated story, to balance the above:

Pope Francis Gives Catholic Church’s Highest Layperson Honor to Top Pro-Life Attorney
Pope Francis has honored Alliance Defending Freedom Founder Alan Sears and his wife, Paula, with the highest honor that the pope can bestow upon laypeople by knighting them into the Order of St. Gregory the Great. The pope bestows the honor upon both Catholic and non-Catholic men and women for having shown, “by their sustained service, extraordinary love for Jesus Christ and His Church” in their communities and countries.
ADF is a pro bono legal charity which helps individuals and groups defend their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, as well as pro-life activists who are threatened by legal actions of oppressive governing bodies.
Let God arise! Let His enemies be scattered! And let all who hate Him flee before His Holy Face! - Ps 67

"Utter frogshit from start to finish." - Onyx

User avatar
wosbald
What's the funny part?
What's the funny part?
Posts: 17280
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by wosbald » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:33 am

+JMJ+

Academy for Life no longer an 'enclave of the ideologically pure'
Image
The Rev. Nigel Biggar. (Credit: Youtube.)

The chorus of criticism from former members of the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) at the new appointees to the pope’s advisory board on life issues illustrates perfectly why the makeover was necessary.

Their fire has been directed, above all, at Rev. Nigel Biggar, an Anglican clergyman and moral theologian who is Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology at Christchurch College, Oxford, and director of the McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics, and Public Life. He is one of a handful of non-Catholics among the 45 new members from 27 countries announced last week.

Former members, notably the British bioethicist Luke Gormally and Christine Vollmer, president of the Latin-American Alliance for the Family, have described Biggar’s appointment as a “scandal” and “shocking” because the theologian once gave an interview in which he said he could imagine abortion being morally permissible up to 18 weeks from conception (a more conservative position, given that British law allows for abortion up to 24 weeks).

[…]

The new PAV membership is packed with impressive Catholics known for their pro-life witness and fidelity to Catholic doctrine, as well as experts — among them a Nobel Prize in Medicine — who will bring great credibility, as well as intellectual heft, to the PAV. They represent, says Paglia, the academy’s “passion for human life.”

But they also represent an attempt by Francis and Paglia to break free of the stranglehold of a pro-life activism closely tied to traditionalist and conservative family-values politics, which has undermined the PAV’s credibility and hindered its pro-life witness. (Gormally, for example, is one of a number of traditionalist signatories to a letter claiming that Amoris Laetitia contains “dangers to Catholic faith and morals”).

[…]

Rather than the ungracious language of “shocking” and “scandalous,” we should be welcoming the non-Catholic experts such as Biggar, and saying: “thank you for giving your time to the PAV; we — and the pro-life cause — will greatly benefit from your presence.”




"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
Thunktank
Terminal Lance. Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Terminal Lance.  Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Posts: 20639
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: SS Minnow

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by Thunktank » Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:43 pm

wosbald wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:33 am
+JMJ+

Academy for Life no longer an 'enclave of the ideologically pure'
Image
The Rev. Nigel Biggar. (Credit: Youtube.)

The chorus of criticism from former members of the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) at the new appointees to the pope’s advisory board on life issues illustrates perfectly why the makeover was necessary.

Their fire has been directed, above all, at Rev. Nigel Biggar, an Anglican clergyman and moral theologian who is Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology at Christchurch College, Oxford, and director of the McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics, and Public Life. He is one of a handful of non-Catholics among the 45 new members from 27 countries announced last week.

Former members, notably the British bioethicist Luke Gormally and Christine Vollmer, president of the Latin-American Alliance for the Family, have described Biggar’s appointment as a “scandal” and “shocking” because the theologian once gave an interview in which he said he could imagine abortion being morally permissible up to 18 weeks from conception (a more conservative position, given that British law allows for abortion up to 24 weeks).

[…]

The new PAV membership is packed with impressive Catholics known for their pro-life witness and fidelity to Catholic doctrine, as well as experts — among them a Nobel Prize in Medicine — who will bring great credibility, as well as intellectual heft, to the PAV. They represent, says Paglia, the academy’s “passion for human life.”

But they also represent an attempt by Francis and Paglia to break free of the stranglehold of a pro-life activism closely tied to traditionalist and conservative family-values politics, which has undermined the PAV’s credibility and hindered its pro-life witness. (Gormally, for example, is one of a number of traditionalist signatories to a letter claiming that Amoris Laetitia contains “dangers to Catholic faith and morals”).

[…]

Rather than the ungracious language of “shocking” and “scandalous,” we should be welcoming the non-Catholic experts such as Biggar, and saying: “thank you for giving your time to the PAV; we — and the pro-life cause — will greatly benefit from your presence.”
You chose to cut out some of the subjectively best parts, funny how that happens. Things like:
In its new statutes, Francis broadens out the pro-life stance away from a narrow focus on bioethics and sexuality, calling for “the promotion of a quality of human life that integrates spiritual and material values, with a view to an authentic ‘human ecology,’ which may help to recover the original balance of creation between the human person and the entire universe.”
I would like to hear more about this. What does this really mean?

User avatar
hugodrax
Legal Artisan
Legal Artisan
Posts: 12825
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:00 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by hugodrax » Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:40 pm

Nobody knows, I'm afraid.

User avatar
wosbald
What's the funny part?
What's the funny part?
Posts: 17280
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by wosbald » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:10 pm

+JMJ+
Thunktank wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:43 pm
In its new statutes, Francis broadens out the pro-life stance away from a narrow focus on bioethics and sexuality, calling for “the promotion of a quality of human life that integrates spiritual and material values, with a view to an authentic ‘human ecology,’ which may help to recover the original balance of creation between the human person and the entire universe.”
I would like to hear more about this. What does this really mean?
It may well be that documents like these may be easier to understand by what they are not intending to mean, as I think the previous paragraph shows:
… an attempt by Francis and Paglia to break free of the stranglehold of a pro-life activism closely tied to traditionalist and conservative family-values politics, which has undermined the PAV’s credibility and hindered its pro-life witness.
And if you need more context, here's the original document: Statute of the Pontifical Academy for Life




"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
Thunktank
Terminal Lance. Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Terminal Lance.  Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Posts: 20639
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: SS Minnow

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by Thunktank » Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:45 pm

wosbald wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:10 pm
+JMJ+
Thunktank wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:43 pm
In its new statutes, Francis broadens out the pro-life stance away from a narrow focus on bioethics and sexuality, calling for “the promotion of a quality of human life that integrates spiritual and material values, with a view to an authentic ‘human ecology,’ which may help to recover the original balance of creation between the human person and the entire universe.”
I would like to hear more about this. What does this really mean?
IMO, documents like these are easier understood by what they are not intending to mean, as I think that the previous paragraph shows:
… an attempt by Francis and Paglia to break free of the stranglehold of a pro-life activism closely tied to traditionalist and conservative family-values politics, which has undermined the PAV’s credibility and hindered its pro-life witness.
And if you need more context, here's the original document: Statute of the Pontifical Academy for Life
Right, and this is a perceived problem for the Pope to overcome in hopes of gaining a broader support for other concerns from other groups of people. I'm curious as to how these new appointments are thought to improve that situation. I'm sure there's much I don't know going on that isn't being addressed as you noted.

A quick search found an opinion that resonates with me quite a bit. From a Jesuit publication:

Peer Pressure: A new Catholic wonders how to be pro-life.

User avatar
Del
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Posts: 34825
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by Del » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:57 pm

Thunktank wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:43 pm
You chose to cut out some of the subjectively best parts, funny how that happens. Things like:
In its new statutes, Francis broadens out the pro-life stance away from a narrow focus on bioethics and sexuality, calling for “the promotion of a quality of human life that integrates spiritual and material values, with a view to an authentic ‘human ecology,’ which may help to recover the original balance of creation between the human person and the entire universe.”
I would like to hear more about this. What does this really mean?
hugodrax wrote:
Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:40 pm
Nobody knows, I'm afraid.
Francis is not a teacher. Which is fine, as long as we do not expect him to speak with clarity and precision.

Francis wants us to think for ourselves, remembering the love for all things that is central to the Christian Tradition.

So here is what Francis is saying to me:

We must remember love for future generations of our own... so the first thing is that we must not kill our own children. We must be willing to make the sacrifices that it takes to welcome a child, if we are going to do the things that make a child.

And we must show our love for future generations of all families.... and therefore strive to hand them a world that is better than we found it. This means economic and social and environmental improvements.

And we must love the natural creation for its own sake, preserving and improving for future generations the gifts that God has given us.

As with all love, these require me to make sacrifices so that others may enjoy. I have to tend to my duties more, instead of insisting on my rights.

This thinking runs contrary to modern selfishness.
- A woman's duty to preserve the innocent life developing within her surpasses her "right" to "control her own body."
- We have to wear helmets on our motorcycles and bicycles and seatbelts in our cars because our lives belong to the community more than our thrills belong to ourselves.
- Our charity works to the community are more important than our greed to hoard wealth and resources.
- Our hyper-consumptive life styles are rapacious.
And so one.

There is something in here to challenge leftists, capitalists, and libertarians. A holistic worldview is needed.
Let God arise! Let His enemies be scattered! And let all who hate Him flee before His Holy Face! - Ps 67

"Utter frogshit from start to finish." - Onyx

User avatar
hugodrax
Legal Artisan
Legal Artisan
Posts: 12825
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:00 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by hugodrax » Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:11 pm

But you must admit, Del, that's what it means to you. It might mean something very different to the Maryknoll Fathers.

User avatar
wosbald
What's the funny part?
What's the funny part?
Posts: 17280
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by wosbald » Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:17 am

+JMJ+

'If you don't think Francis is the cure, you don't grasp the disease,' CL head says
Image
Father Julián Carrón, leader of the Catholic movement Communion and Liberation. (Credit: Communion and Liberation.)

Although some Catholics, especially the more conservative sort, often find Pope Francis a bit of a shock to the system, the leader of the Church's influential Communion and Liberation movement says that if you don't think this pontiff is the cure, then you don't understand the nature of the disease we're facing in a post-modern, secular world.

MILAN – Probably better than most, Father Julián Carrón, the successor of the legendary Italian Father Luigi Giussani as leader of the influential Communion and Liberation movement, whose natural base is among more conservative Catholics, understands that Pope Francis can be a shock to the system.

Yet he’s still an unabashed Francis fan, who insists that if you don’t think this pope is the cure, then you don’t understand the disease we’re facing in the post-modern world.

[…]

“The changes we’re living through are so radical, so unprecedented, that I get why many people just don’t understand what’s happening or the gestures of Pope Francis,” he said. “But if we don’t understand those gestures now, we will in a time when we see the consequences they’re leading to.”

Carrón argued that what’s happened in modernity is that people have lost site of what it means to be a human being, so the crisis is much deeper than simply the rejection of this or that ethical precept, and that what’s needed now is not so much moral exhortation or theological argument, but the attractive power of a fully Christian life.

[…]

Far from seeing a rupture between Francis and his immediate predecessors, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Carrón insists that Francis is actually the “radicalization” of Benedict.

“He says the same thing, but in a way that it gets across to everyone in a simple way through gestures, without in any sense reducing the density of what Benedict said,” he said. …




"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
John-Boy
I'm a lover and I'm a sinner
I'm a lover and I'm a sinner
Posts: 31528
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:00 pm
Contact:

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by John-Boy » Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:26 pm

Loving "Pints With Aquinas" podcast by Matt Fradd
Praying - coco
Sometimes memes can be helpful as well as humorous - Jocose
Yer mom is kindhearted and well respected in her community - JMG

User avatar
Kerdy
Smootchie
Smootchie
Posts: 16927
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: It changes daily

Re: THE CATHOLIC THREAD

Post by Kerdy » Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:39 pm

Del wrote:
Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:42 am
wosbald wrote:
Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:11 am
+JMJ+

Immigration arrests stun Detroit’s Chaldean Catholics
Image
Friends and family view a bus outside the U.S. Detention and Deportation Center in Detroit, Sunday, June 11, 2017. A mass immigration and deportation sweep and arrest of dozens of Chaldeans in southeastern Michigan by U.S. immigration officials prompted the protest outside the detention center. Family members of the Catholics with Iraqi roots who were arrested indicate most had criminal records and were awaiting deportation. (Credit: Gus Burns/Mlive.com via AP.)

DETROIT - Dozens of Chaldean Christians were arrested by federal immigration officials over the weekend in the Detroit metropolitan area, leaving the local Church community with sadness and frustration.

“Yesterday was a very strange and painful day for our community in America,” Bishop Francis Kalabat of the Chaldean Catholic Eparchy of St. Thomas the Apostle of Detroit stated Monday in a Facebook post.

“With the many Chaldeans that were awakened by Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and consequently picked up for deportation, there is a lot of confusion and anger,” he added.

Fr. Anthony Kathawa of St. Thomas Chaldean Church in West Bloomfield, Michigan, told Catholic News Agency June 12 that “As a community, we’re all suffering seeing the loss of our loved ones.”

On Sunday, the Detroit Free Press reported that ICE made around 40 arrests of Chaldeans in the Detroit area, according to community leaders.
ICE explained in a statement that Iraq, in negotiations with the U.S., had “agreed to accept” the individuals, who had criminal records.

“As a result of recent negotiations between the U.S. and Iraq, Iraq has recently agreed to accept a number of Iraqi nationals subject to orders of removal,” ICE stated.

A federal judge had also “ordered them removed,” ICE said, noting that their previous criminal offenses included homicide, rape, sexual assault, kidnapping, and “weapons violations.”

A “majority” of those detained are now at the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center in Youngstown, Ohio.

Many of those with criminal records have served their time in prison and have since become good citizens and members of the community, local church leaders insisted. …
Saw this story on EWTN.

Christians are moving back into bombed-out Mosul.

But in America, the Trump Administration has not moved swiftly or humanely in favor of Christians displaced from Syria or Iraq as we had hoped. It is still as bad as the Obama Administration.
When government fails, and it usually does, it is up to us to make a difference. Check out the Nazarene Fund. They are saving a lot of people. It is run by Mercury One.
"Let it be understood that those who are not found living as He taught are not Christian- even though they profess with the lips the teaching of Christ." - Justin Martyr  ( c.160 )

“Moral principles do not depend on a majority vote. Wrong is wrong, even if everybody is wrong. Right is right, even if nobody is right.” - Venerable Servant of God, Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests