Take it away, Hugo.tuttle wrote:Why not try to explain, addressing it to my specific point? Is my assumption off base?hugodrax wrote:Why don't you take a minute and work your way through a basic primer first? There's a lot out there on this. Otherwise, you're just going to summon Del.
tuttle wrote:As of now, my assumption is that the Roman Catholic Church does not allow priests to divulge anything that was confessed, most likely (again, assuming) because once it is confessed the priest can pronounce forgiveness to the one confessing, thus divulging what was confessed more or less tramples upon said forgiveness offered(?) rendering a sacramental conflict: namely that the man left unforgiven/uncleansed (or was lied to/betrayed). Is that close to the mark?
FWIW, I'm ready to jump-in, if my neurons jump-start.