JudgeRusty wrote: ↑
Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:39 pm
Rusty wrote: ↑
Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:17 pm
I think you had something other than Scotch flake.
Are there two versions? My 2/2015 P&C order says "Gawith & Hoggarth Scotch Flake Scented ."
Goose said some of the GH blends come scented or unscented.
True. I only see one on Smokingpipes.
The first review on TR says:
"Very slight bakers chocolate aroma and flavor but it's way in the background. Not noticed with each puff but occasionally rears its head, however slightly. It melds with the virginia and provides a nice, spicy, semi-sweet smoke."
There are certainly others that uses the same words... I can find lots of them, right into 2016.
"I have little to add. Yes, the chocolate notes are there in the aroma. Yes, it is a sweet, bready VA. Yes, it smokes impeccably as is typical of GH&Co tobaccos."
Not everyone says that. Here's a fellow that says something VERY different. This is closer to your view.
"I know the description says no added flavoring, but dadgumit, the G&H perfume is in this one too. Maybe the crop dusting machines for G&H Virginia tobaccos spray Chanel #5 as they protect the leaf from bugs."
So this is a real puzzle. I can't explain why for some it's chocolate and for others it's the equivalent of little old ladies. Can you explain it? To me these read like different tobaccos. The reviews are vastly different. And holding me responsible for this odd situation is really not fair. I'm with the chocolate guys, who are, btw, the majority. You aren't. And probably Coco isn't either. You guys are impaired and you're not alone. This is sad. All this time I thought you guys were weird and it turns out that you really are weird.