Mary Alone

For those deep thinkers out there.

Moderator: tuttle

Post Reply
User avatar
Thunktank
Terminal Lance. Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Terminal Lance.  Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Posts: 21860
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Home Sweet California at the Beach!

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Thunktank » Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:39 pm

wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:10 pm
+JMJ+
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:04 pm
[…]

1) If maintaining Mary's virginity is the heart of the matter. Then sure. Go for it. But I would contend that Christ's Incarnation, and his humanity, is more to the heart of the matter, which is why a teleportation birth seems to be a shaky foundation to set the stage of the Incarnation. …

[…]
Leaving aside terminological wranglings over "teleportation", the deeper issue seems to be over attributing a "miraculous" character to the Birth. Though I'm not especially knowledgable in this area, I would think that the partisans of this view would, rather than its miraculous character, insist on its "originary" character as being a mode of Birth proper to Man in his original integrity (in his Prelapsarian state). Which is to say, a mode of birth which is natural-though-unfallen — as passing through the birth canal without opening/wounding it — rather than as a miraculous mode which bypasses natural channels. This would also seem to account for Mary's not being subject to labor pains.
Things that make me go hmmmm. . .

Good grief this particular side of the topic is silly. :egor: :lol:

I have visions of ancient desert monks standing in the sun’s rays for a long time thinking this stuff up.
“Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” -Yoda

“I grew up in a church with Ned Flanders. Down to the mustache. But so did a bunch of people I assume, which makes it so fun-diddly-unny.” -tuttle

User avatar
infidel
kthxbai
kthxbai
Posts: 6483
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: Mary Alone

Post by infidel » Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:18 pm

Thunktank wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:39 pm
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:10 pm
+JMJ+
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:04 pm
[…]

1) If maintaining Mary's virginity is the heart of the matter. Then sure. Go for it. But I would contend that Christ's Incarnation, and his humanity, is more to the heart of the matter, which is why a teleportation birth seems to be a shaky foundation to set the stage of the Incarnation. …

[…]
Leaving aside terminological wranglings over "teleportation", the deeper issue seems to be over attributing a "miraculous" character to the Birth. Though I'm not especially knowledgable in this area, I would think that the partisans of this view would, rather than its miraculous character, insist on its "originary" character as being a mode of Birth proper to Man in his original integrity (in his Prelapsarian state). Which is to say, a mode of birth which is natural-though-unfallen — as passing through the birth canal without opening/wounding it — rather than as a miraculous mode which bypasses natural channels. This would also seem to account for Mary's not being subject to labor pains.
Things that make me go hmmmm. . .

Good grief this particular side of the topic is silly. :egor: :lol:

I have visions of ancient desert monks standing in the sun’s rays for a long time thinking this stuff up.
It makes total sense in a closed-loop kind of way. Similar to the idea of drinking God's blood to live forever, or bigger objects will fall faster than smaller objects. Total sense if you start with certain givens and reason deductively without ever taking any measurements from reality.
Inadvertently emboldening the cause of naïve Evolutionism since 2016.

"Who the hell ponders placentas? Dude, you're a freak of nature." - DepartedLight

"One man's saint is another man's infidel." - hugodrax

"Total. Freaking. Win." - Skip

User avatar
Thunktank
Terminal Lance. Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Terminal Lance.  Perpetual Sea Lawyer. Unicorn Aficionado
Posts: 21860
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Home Sweet California at the Beach!

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Thunktank » Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:28 pm

infidel wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:18 pm
Thunktank wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:39 pm
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:10 pm
+JMJ+
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:04 pm
[…]

1) If maintaining Mary's virginity is the heart of the matter. Then sure. Go for it. But I would contend that Christ's Incarnation, and his humanity, is more to the heart of the matter, which is why a teleportation birth seems to be a shaky foundation to set the stage of the Incarnation. …

[…]
Leaving aside terminological wranglings over "teleportation", the deeper issue seems to be over attributing a "miraculous" character to the Birth. Though I'm not especially knowledgable in this area, I would think that the partisans of this view would, rather than its miraculous character, insist on its "originary" character as being a mode of Birth proper to Man in his original integrity (in his Prelapsarian state). Which is to say, a mode of birth which is natural-though-unfallen — as passing through the birth canal without opening/wounding it — rather than as a miraculous mode which bypasses natural channels. This would also seem to account for Mary's not being subject to labor pains.
Things that make me go hmmmm. . .

Good grief this particular side of the topic is silly. :egor: :lol:

I have visions of ancient desert monks standing in the sun’s rays for a long time thinking this stuff up.
It makes total sense in a closed-loop kind of way. Similar to the idea of drinking God's blood to live forever, or bigger objects will fall faster than smaller objects. Total sense if you start with certain givens and reason deductively without ever taking any measurements from reality.
Sure it makes sense. After all, any measurement is possible in the prelapsarian state. :wink:
“Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” -Yoda

“I grew up in a church with Ned Flanders. Down to the mustache. But so did a bunch of people I assume, which makes it so fun-diddly-unny.” -tuttle

User avatar
durangopipe
Under-secretary to the Minister of Pipe Breaking
Under-secretary to the Minister of Pipe Breaking
Posts: 6049
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Southwest Colorado

Re: Mary Alone

Post by durangopipe » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:50 pm

This concise summary might be helpful for Protestants unfamiliar with Catholic theological tradition regarding the Virgin Birth:

http://www.motherofallpeoples.com/2012/ ... tradition/
. . . be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you. Ephesians 4:32 (NKJV)

The most improper job of any man, even saints, is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity.. J.R.R. Tolkien

2017 Morley - Outstanding BRATASS of the Year

User avatar
Del
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Posts: 37646
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Del » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:44 am

Thunktank wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:39 pm
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:10 pm
+JMJ+
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:04 pm
[…]

1) If maintaining Mary's virginity is the heart of the matter. Then sure. Go for it. But I would contend that Christ's Incarnation, and his humanity, is more to the heart of the matter, which is why a teleportation birth seems to be a shaky foundation to set the stage of the Incarnation. …

[…]
Leaving aside terminological wranglings over "teleportation", the deeper issue seems to be over attributing a "miraculous" character to the Birth. Though I'm not especially knowledgable in this area, I would think that the partisans of this view would, rather than its miraculous character, insist on its "originary" character as being a mode of Birth proper to Man in his original integrity (in his Prelapsarian state). Which is to say, a mode of birth which is natural-though-unfallen — as passing through the birth canal without opening/wounding it — rather than as a miraculous mode which bypasses natural channels. This would also seem to account for Mary's not being subject to labor pains.
Things that make me go hmmmm. . .

Good grief this particular side of the topic is silly. :egor: :lol:

I have visions of ancient desert monks standing in the sun’s rays for a long time thinking this stuff up.
I don't know about the Desert Monks, but that is often how I imagine wosbald.
"Utter frogshit from start to finish." - Onyx

"I shall not wear a crown of gold where my Master wore a crown of thorns." - Godfrey de Bouillon

User avatar
Joshoowah
Hermeneutic of suspicion
Hermeneutic of suspicion
Posts: 4808
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 6:00 pm
Location: Nairobi, Kenya; formerly Wilmore, KY; Formerly Athens, AL
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Joshoowah » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:15 am

Del wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:42 pm
Joshoowah wrote:
Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:30 pm
Del wrote:
The ancient understanding of virginity was "opening the womb." The modern definition is confined to sexual innocence. Since Jesus and Mary and the Gospels were so long ago, we have to open ourselves to the ancient understanding.
I understand the Catholic doctrine of Immaculate Conception, but I do not understand where this idea of the ancient understanding of virginity meaning "opening the womb."

I am genuinely seeking a starting point on this thought because this has never came up in my Church Father reading (I have them all) nor my cultural studies of the Ancient Near East or the Roman first-century.

I do know the term virgin had a broader meaning, but I've just never seen the reference you used anywhere. I'm going to go through my Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew lexicons later to see if I missed something.

Sent from my CPH1723 using Tapatalk
Here is a brief segment from my Mariology textbook. Note the reference from St. Augustine.
Mary’s Virginity in the Birth

It was also fitting that Christ Himself leave intact that bodily integrity of His Mother when He came forth from the womb, to give further evidence that she was the fulfillment of the figure in the Old Testament of a garden enclosed and a fountain sealed (Song 4:12). Thus He came forth through closed doors, much as on the day of His Resurrection, in His glorious body, He came through the closed doors of the Cenacle, locked for fear of the Jews. In a homily on the Nativity, St. Augustine made this comparison:

"Why, then, could He, who as a grown man was able to enter through closed portals, not pass through incorrupt members as an infant?. . . If faith believes that God was born in the flesh, it does not doubt that the two miracles are possible to God, namely, that though the doors of the house were closed, He manifested His mature body to those within the house, and that as an infant He came forth, a spouse from His bride-chamber, that is, from the virginal womb, leaving His Mother‘s integrity inviolate."150

In this way, Mary did not suffer the pains of childbirth as other mothers do who are subject to the penalties of original sin.
Furthermore, the pain of labor in childbirth is a penalty of original sin, as seen in Gen 3:16, in which God said to Eve: "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children." It was fitting that Mary, who was exempt from all stain of original sin, be exempt from the pains of childbirth in the birth of her Son.

150 St. Augustine, Sermon 191.1 on the Nativity, trans. Mary S. Muldowney, in Saint Augustine: Sermons on the Liturgical Seasons, series: Fathers of the Church, vol. 38 (New York: Fathers of the Church, Inc., 1959), 29.
I have more references, if you want to dig further.
I remember that instance in Augustine, but it still does not answer my question. What else you got that I can look into? Looking forward to it.
"For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labor for me. Yet what shall I choose?" Philippians 1:21-22

ImageImage

User avatar
Del
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Posts: 37646
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Del » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:22 am

Joshoowah wrote:
Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:15 am

I remember that instance in Augustine, but it still does not answer my question. What else you got that I can look into? Looking forward to it.
durangopipe's link above has a long list of references in the Early Church Fathers.
"Utter frogshit from start to finish." - Onyx

"I shall not wear a crown of gold where my Master wore a crown of thorns." - Godfrey de Bouillon

User avatar
Jester
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1499
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 1:10 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Jester » Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:25 am

I watched a debate on YouTube that covers a lot of what is discussed here. Sadly, when I finished watching I looked up the Catholic debater Gerry Matatics. It appears that he has been denounced by several sects of the Catholic church and even banned from other speaking events. My question is would you (Del and Wos) consider this debate valid? Can you direct me to another similar debate on this subject?
Pumpkin Ale is more American than apple pie! -Tuttle

"O Christmas Tree is going to be a dirge in his home this year I fear."

We almost solved the Mary issue. -FredS

User avatar
wosbald
Crux' Cleveland Correspondent
Crux' Cleveland Correspondent
Posts: 19373
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by wosbald » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:05 am

+JMJ+
Jester wrote:
Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:25 am
I watched a debate on YouTube that covers a lot of what is discussed here. Sadly, when I finished watching I looked up the Catholic debater Gerry Matatics. It appears that he has been denounced by several sects of the Catholic church and even banned from other speaking events. My question is would you (Del and Wos) consider this debate valid? Can you direct me to another similar debate on this subject?
Well, it certainly can't be Catholically "invalid". That is, not unless he was specifically arguing against Catholic dogmatics.

Otherwise, it would still be Catholically valid, even if he did a crappy job. It would be validly crappy.
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
wosbald
Crux' Cleveland Correspondent
Crux' Cleveland Correspondent
Posts: 19373
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by wosbald » Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:31 am

+JMJ+
Jester wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:43 am
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:39 am
Jester wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:24 am
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:11 am
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:30 am
… The angel did not come with a request: "Will you allow the Holy Spirit to come upon you in order that you will conceive in your womb and bear a son?", But he came with a proclamation: "You will conceive in your womb and bear a son."

[…]
To me this sounds like the angel essentially saying, "Look, this is gonna happen one way or the other, so you might as well relax and try to enjoy it."

If so, then "the holy rape of the soul", indeed.
I would be a lot more cautious in my words if I were you. You are indeed calling the God of all creation a rapist.
So, I'm right?

Okay. Thanx for the confirmation.

I guess we're done here. Image

If God were to take your life tonight would you call him a murderer? Does anyone here actually think there is something God can take from you that does not already belong to him?
Hmmm … then again, we might not quite be done here. Seems like the intersection of a woke Wizard of Smart (might that be a "woke Wos"?) and a certain Pastor Robert Jeffress has summoned the shade from its spectral slumber.


God SEXUALLY ASSAULTED Virgin Mary getting her pregnant without CONSENT — shock claim
Image
Image: GETTY

GOD SEXUALLY ASSAULTED the Virgin Mary when he impregnated her with Jesus Christ, a professor in the US has controversially claimed.

The academic has accused God of not getting consent from the virgin Jewish teenager when he supposedly conceived Christ through divine intervention. Not surprisingly the claim by Dr Eric Sprankle on the cusp of the Christmas season, has sparked outrage across Christian America. Dr Sprankle, who Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology & Sexuality Studies at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and an advocate for sex workers’s rights made the shocking claim on Twitter.

He said: “The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen.

“There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario.”

He then signs off tongue-in-cheek: “Happy Holidays”.

Some sections of the Christian following were understandably outraged by the claims, with many saying that God is simply above the law.

Dr Robert Jeffress, the pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, told Starnes Country: “Dr Sprankle’s comments are nothing but blasphemous babble from a liberal who is completely ignorant of the Bible.

“Furthermore, a sovereign God doesn’t need ‘consent’ from any of us for anything He chooses to do.”

[…]
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." - Our Lady of Fatima

User avatar
Jester
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1499
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 1:10 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Jester » Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:39 am

wosbald wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:31 am
+JMJ+
Jester wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:43 am
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:39 am
Jester wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:24 am
wosbald wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:11 am
tuttle wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:30 am
… The angel did not come with a request: "Will you allow the Holy Spirit to come upon you in order that you will conceive in your womb and bear a son?", But he came with a proclamation: "You will conceive in your womb and bear a son."

[…]
To me this sounds like the angel essentially saying, "Look, this is gonna happen one way or the other, so you might as well relax and try to enjoy it."

If so, then "the holy rape of the soul", indeed.
I would be a lot more cautious in my words if I were you. You are indeed calling the God of all creation a rapist.
So, I'm right?

Okay. Thanx for the confirmation.

I guess we're done here. Image

If God were to take your life tonight would you call him a murderer? Does anyone here actually think there is something God can take from you that does not already belong to him?
Hmmm … then again, we might not quite be done here. Seems like the intersection of a woke Wizard of Smart (might that be a "woke Wos"?) and a certain Pastor Robert Jeffress has summoned the shade from its spectral slumber.


God SEXUALLY ASSAULTED Virgin Mary getting her pregnant without CONSENT — shock claim
Image
Image: GETTY

GOD SEXUALLY ASSAULTED the Virgin Mary when he impregnated her with Jesus Christ, a professor in the US has controversially claimed.

The academic has accused God of not getting consent from the virgin Jewish teenager when he supposedly conceived Christ through divine intervention. Not surprisingly the claim by Dr Eric Sprankle on the cusp of the Christmas season, has sparked outrage across Christian America. Dr Sprankle, who Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology & Sexuality Studies at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and an advocate for sex workers’s rights made the shocking claim on Twitter.

He said: “The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen.

“There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario.”

He then signs off tongue-in-cheek: “Happy Holidays”.

Some sections of the Christian following were understandably outraged by the claims, with many saying that God is simply above the law.

Dr Robert Jeffress, the pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, told Starnes Country: “Dr Sprankle’s comments are nothing but blasphemous babble from a liberal who is completely ignorant of the Bible.

“Furthermore, a sovereign God doesn’t need ‘consent’ from any of us for anything He chooses to do.”

[…]
I think you were right the first time when you said we are done here.
Pumpkin Ale is more American than apple pie! -Tuttle

"O Christmas Tree is going to be a dirge in his home this year I fear."

We almost solved the Mary issue. -FredS

User avatar
FredS
Really, really likes watching kids fish.
Really, really likes watching kids fish.
Posts: 21419
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: NOCO (Northern Colorado)

Re: Mary Alone

Post by FredS » Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:50 am

Image
"If we ever get to heaven boys, it aint because we aint done nothin' wrong" - Kris Kristofferson

"One of the things I love about CPS is the frank and enthusiastic dysfunction here. God help me, I do love it so." – OldWorldSwine

"I'd like to put a hook in that puppet and swing it through a bunch of salmon!" - durangopipe

User avatar
Del
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Hacked by Kellyanne Conway
Posts: 37646
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Del » Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:28 pm

Dec. 8, 2018.

A Blessed Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception. Joy to the World!


FYI: The patron saint of the United States is Mary, Conceived Without Sin.
"Utter frogshit from start to finish." - Onyx

"I shall not wear a crown of gold where my Master wore a crown of thorns." - Godfrey de Bouillon

User avatar
Hovannes
one lone Wollensak
one lone Wollensak
Posts: 23901
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: In the fertile San Joaquin Valley

Re: Mary Alone

Post by Hovannes » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:24 pm

Del wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:28 pm
Dec. 8, 2018.

A Blessed Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception. Joy to the World!


FYI: The patron saint of the United States is Mary, Conceived Without Sin.
+1
"What doesn't kill you, gives you a lot of unhealthy coping mechanisms and a really dark sense of humor."

Post Reply